California has the largest population and economy among all US states, and the second highest energy consumption after Texas. However, according to the , the energy consumption per capita in California is among the lowest in the USA. In great part, this has been possible thanks to the Building Energy Efficiency Standards found in Title 24, Parts 6 and 11, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).
Actually, Title 24 contains all the California state building codes, covering areas like mechanical equipment, electrical wiring and plumbing installations. However, the construction industry associates Title 24 with energy performance requirements for buildings. When architects and engineers refer to Title 24 calculations and forms, they are actually talking about the California Energy Efficiency Standards Compliance Forms.
The Title 24 forms must be submitted to the building department as part of the project approval process in California. These forms are used to document energy compliance in project designs, and they are required for building permits. The Title 24 energy requirements apply for new homes, modifications to existing homes, and commercial buildings. These requirements were originally for state-owned properties, but the code was changed to include privately-owned residential and commercial buildings.
According to the California Energy Commision (CEC), the state’s energy code was developed to “reduce wasteful and unnecessary energy consumption in newly constructed and existing buildings.” The energy codes establish a baseline, but building owners can exceed their requirements to achieve even greater energy savings.
The first version of the California was published in 1978, which means these standards have been improving energy efficiency for over four decades. They are reviewed every three years by the California Energy Commission (CEC), and the 2019 standards replaced the 2016 version since January 1, 2020. Following the three-year update cycle, the next version will be published in 2021. The CEC conducts a public review process, where the California construction industry can provide suggestions and feedback.
Most energy efficiency measures offer an attractive return on investment, and every dollar spent on them is recovered many times. Building energy codes simply make these measures mandatory up to a specified performance level. California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards are demanding, but they provide several benefits in residential and commercial properties:
- Lower energy consumption and reduced operating costs. Since the building energy standards were introduced in 1978, they have saved over $70 billion for homes and businesses in California.
- Improving energy availability and making the power grid more reliable, by reducing the electrical load from homes and commercial buildings. For example, if 1,000 buildings reduce power consumption by 20 kilowatts each, a total load of 20 megawatts is removed from the grid.
- Reducing emissions and the overall environmental impact of the building sector.
- Some energy efficiency measures also make indoor spaces more comfortable, and smart ventilation controls are a good example.
Thanks to the Title 24 energy efficiency standards in California, the residential and commercial sectors consume less than 20% of the state’s energy each. For comparison, the industrial sector consumes 25% of the state’s energy, while the transportation sector consumes 40%.
Building owners and real estate developers must be aware that Title 24 is strictly enforced in California. There are legal consequences for not meeting Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and the corresponding fines can exceed $5,000 per code violation. To make sure your project meets the Title 24 requirements, the best recommendation is working with a qualified engineering firm.
The Building Energy Efficiency Standards establish a minimum performance level for the residential and commercial buildings they cover. However, there are two compliance methods to choose from - the Prescriptive method and the Performance method. Each method has advantages and disadvantages.
- The Title 24 Prescriptive Method provides minimum requirements for individual building elements, equipment and components. If all the elements covered by the code are compliant, the entire building is also considered compliant.
- The Title 24 Performance Method focuses on the overall performance of the building, instead of providing individual requirements for components. When this method is chosen, the energy modeling software used to calculate performance must be certified by the California Energy Commission.
Every building project in California must meet energy efficiency standards, regardless of the calculation method, and the owner must submit a Title 24 compliance report.
The Prescriptive method is straightforward and less complex, since component specifications and energy efficiency are predetermined by the CEC. To make a residential or commercial building compliant, the owner must only make sure that all components meet the Title 24 energy requirements. However, the Prescriptive method limits design flexibility, and meeting minimum requirements for all components and equipment can be expensive. In other words, the Prescriptive method does not allow trade-offs - reducing the performance of one building system and compensating with higher performance in another area.
The Performance method provides more flexibility during the design process. As long as the building meets a minimum energy performance level as a whole, individual components are not subject to minimum requirements.
- With the performance method, the building design can balance some less efficient features by achieving a higher efficiency in other areas. Engineers can analyze the trade-offs involved in building design decisions, meeting Title 24 at an optimal cost.
- For example, large window areas reduce efficiency by increasing summer heat gain and winter heat loss. However, they can be compensated with features like a higher HVAC efficiency and lighting efficiency.
In a few words, the Building Energy Efficiency Standards in Title 24 describe a typical building that meets the minimum requirements, providing a baseline for all projects. When approving a residential or commercial building in California, its performance is compared with the baseline. To be approved, a project must have an energy performance equivalent to the baseline or higher.
For example, assume a landlord plans to upgrade all the windows in an apartment building. With the prescriptive method, it would be necessary to look for specific windows that meet all the requirements in Title 24. On the other hand, the performance method gives the owner freedom to choose any windows, and energy modeling can be used to prove code compliance.